Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 score. The Google Pixel 4a design is noticeably newer and lighter than the HTC U Ultra's, but it's just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. The HTC U Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The HTC U Ultra captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower resolution camera in the back, a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in low-light situations and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Google Pixel 4a has just a bit longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.