Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Just black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Google Pixel 4a is a newer and a little bit lighter phone than the LG G7 Fit, although it is also a little bit thicker. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG G7 Fit has a better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a bit larger screen and more pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit superior processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
LG G7 Fit features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a features a little longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3140mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a and the LG G7 Fit feature quite similar cameras, because although the LG G7 Fit has a lot smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos and a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, it also counts with a lot better 16 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.