Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ, having an 82.9 score against 81. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a body is extremely newer and somewhat lighter than LG G7 ThinQ's, but it is also just a little bit thicker.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen.
LG G7 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and faster video frame rates.
LG G7 ThinQ features much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a features a bit better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G7 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.