Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, having an 82.9 score against 82.7. These phones come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features. Google Pixel 4a's body is newer, noticeably lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG G8X ThinQ.
The Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4a. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a less MP resolution camera in the back, a worse video resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size.
LG G8X ThinQ has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG G8X ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.