Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Just black | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must note that it's also just a bit thicker and heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but LG K92 has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit better processing power than LG K92. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The LG K92 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
LG K92 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 has better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG K92 costs a little more than Google Pixel 4a, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.