Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Just black | Holographic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, with an 82.9 score against 76.7. Even when Google Pixel 4a and LG Stylo 6 were released with only a couple months difference, Google Pixel 4a is a little bit thinner and extremely lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version.
The LG Stylo 6 and Google Pixel 4a both count with really similar processors, and although the LG Stylo 6 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a has a little sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG Stylo 6 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Google Pixel 4a is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.