Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Just black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a construction is way newer and a bit lighter than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is just a bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a quite larger screen and a just a bit better pixel density. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.