Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's general score of 81.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10. Google Pixel 4a's design is newer and somewhat lighter than LG V40 ThinQ's, although it's just a bit thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little bit better amount of pixels per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a little bigger screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3140mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower resolution camera in the back, a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.