Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Just black | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a, with a overall score of 87.6 against 82.9. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide you identical operating system features. Even being the best in this review, LG V60 ThinQ is an a little thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 4a.
The LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display density.
LG V60 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. The LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.