Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a, having a score of 87.1 against 82.9. LG Velvet's construction is just a little thinner but way heavier than the Google Pixel 4a, and both of them were released with only 3 months difference. The LG Velvet counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 4a features a bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The LG Velvet features a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG Velvet features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
LG Velvet not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.