Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. Even being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it's also a lot heavier and extremely thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but LG Wing has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version.
The LG Wing features a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM. Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
LG Wing counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing captures greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera, higher video frame rate and a much bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
The LG Wing features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a. If you want to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 4a, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.