Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Just black | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4a's overall score of 82.9. Although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 4a, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11, so it offers some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better video definition and a camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.