Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a score of 82.9 against 78.5. Google Pixel 4a is a much older and a little thicker phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Google was able to make it lighter anyway. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's storage capacity for applications and games is just as good as the Google Pixel 4a one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.