Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Just black | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 80.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Even though the Google Pixel 4a is extremely older than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's design is incredibly lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's storage for games and applications is very similar to the Google Pixel 4a one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster). The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a way better 200 megapixels resolution camera, a much larger sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.