Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Just black | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's global score of 82.9. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a noticeably newer phone than Google Pixel 4a, although it's incredibly heavier and just a little thicker.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Google Pixel 4a counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a lot more MP back camera. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 46% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.