Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Just black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a, having an 87.1 score against 82.9. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version, counting with lots of additional features. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is a lot newer than Google Pixel 4a's, although it is a bit thicker and incredibly heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display. Google Pixel 4a features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture, faster 60 fps video frame rate, a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.