Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Just black | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 82.6. The Google Pixel 4a is a just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter phone than the Moto G 5G Plus, even though both were released only a few months apart. The Moto G 5G Plus's processor is just as good as the Google Pixel 4a one, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a way larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.