Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s overall score of 79.3. The Google Pixel 4a construction is a little thinner and notably lighter than Moto G Stylus (2021), although both were released with only 5 months difference. The Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus (2021) captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much more MP camera in the back.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.