Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-02-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Just black | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than Moto G7 Plus, having an 82.9 score against 76.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features and enhanced performance. The Google Pixel 4a is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Moto G7 Plus.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit sharper screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit more pixels per display inch. Moto G7 Plus features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G7 Plus takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality pictures, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.