Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Just black | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, with a global score of 82.9 against 78.6. Even when the Google Pixel 4a and Motorola Moto G9 Power were released with only a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 4a is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. These phones include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a has a better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto G9 Power captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G9 Power also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Moto G9 Power counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.