Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Although the Google Pixel 4a is thicker than Moto Z Force, it's lighter and incredibly newer. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Google Pixel 4a features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more 2200 MHz cpu cores.
The Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto Z Force also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto Z Force counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force counts with a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a costs more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.