Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 82.9 against 77.4. Google Pixel 4a is a way thicker phone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but both of them have equal weights. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4a captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4a also has a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.