Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Just black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than Motorola One Action, with an 82.9 score against 78.5. The Google Pixel 4a body is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola One Action. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. The Motorola One Action features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Action features just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 4a shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Google Pixel 4a costs a little more than Motorola One Action, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.