Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Just black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. Google Pixel 4a's design is just a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than the Motorola One Hyper, even though both were released with only 9 months difference. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a little greater pixels amount in each display inch. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.