Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's general score of 80.7. The Google Pixel 4a is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than Motorola One Vision. Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density. The Motorola One Vision features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola One Vision features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Vision has just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.