Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Just black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 general score. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. Although Motorola razr (2020) and Google Pixel 4a were only released 1 months apart, the Motorola razr (2020) design is much heavier but a little bit thinner.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 4a, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.