Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-09-30 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Nokia 7.2, having an 82.9 score against 75.9. Google Pixel 4a is a a lot lighter cellphone than the Nokia 7.2, but both have the same thickness. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10, providing you some extra features.
The Nokia 7.2's CPU is very similar to the Google Pixel 4a one, both have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit sharper display than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Nokia 7.2 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 7.2 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Nokia 7.2 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Nokia 7.2 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Nokia 7.2 counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.