Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Just black | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, getting an 82.9 score against 80.3. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10. Although Google Pixel 4a and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW were released only 3 months apart, Google Pixel 4a is lighter and a little bit thinner.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Google Pixel 4a both count with very similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with better video frame rates, a lot more megapixels back camera and a much larger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.