Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Just black | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's global score of 76.4. Google Pixel 4a is a newer and lighter device than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it is also just a bit thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a bit greater pixels quantity per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4a also has a more mega-pixels camera, a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Nokia 9 PureView's memory to store more games and applications is just as good as Google Pixel 4a's one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Nokia 9 PureView features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3320mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4a is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.