Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Just black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 overall score. Even though the Google Pixel 4a is older than the Nokia XR20, it's design is extremely lighter and extremely thinner. Both phones in this review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should offer very similar operating system features.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better processor than Nokia XR20. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Nokia XR20 has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Nokia XR20 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Nokia XR20 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.