Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Just black | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having an 83.1 score against 82.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version. OPPO Find X2 Pro is better than Google Pixel 4a, it must be noted that it's also a heavier and just a bit thicker device.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.