Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Just black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 overall score. Google Pixel 4a's design is a little bit thicker but somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give very similar OS features.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger screen.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.