Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Just black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G's global score of 79.9. Although Google Pixel 4a is notably older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is much lighter and a little bit thinner. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bit larger screen. Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A25 5G has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.