Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a, having a overall score of 83.8 against 82.9. The Galaxy A50 design is just a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 4a, although it's heavier and was released only 17 months before. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite higher display density.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Google Pixel 4a, and although the Galaxy A50 has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 25 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.