Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Just black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 82.9. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A50s is an older and somewhat heavier phone than Google Pixel 4a, but Samsung was able to build it a little thinner anyway.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite greater pixel number per inch of screen. The Galaxy A50s features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.