Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Just black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a's overall score of 82.9. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A52 body is a little bit thicker and a lot heavier than Google Pixel 4a. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a CPU that's just as good as Google Pixel 4a's CPU, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.