Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Just black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Google Pixel 4a, it must be told that it's also a incredibly heavier and just a little bit thicker device. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version, so it counts with some nice extra features.
The Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's processing unit is just as good as Google Pixel 4a's processing unit, both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy A52 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.