Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy A6's score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 4a body is notably newer and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A6's, but it is also just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a features a more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a way greater pixels quantity per display inch and a little bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a way higher video definition.
The Google Pixel 4a has slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A6, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.