Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing you a couple additional features. Google Pixel 4a's body is newer and notably lighter, but also just a little thicker than the Galaxy A70.
Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A70. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy A70 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4a captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A70 counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is more expensive than Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.