Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Just black | Blue and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, having a general score of 82.9 against 78.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version while Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Google Pixel 4a construction is a lot newer and lighter, but thicker than the Galaxy C7 Pro.
Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a little higher display density, a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 4a shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.