Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Just black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's global score of 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a somewhat thicker and a lot heavier phone than the Google Pixel 4a. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F62 has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62's CPU is very similar to the Google Pixel 4a one, and although the Galaxy F62 has less cores (although faster), they both have the same RAM amount.
Galaxy F62 features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.