Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Just black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with a global score of 82.9 against 78.9. Google Pixel 4a is a newer cellphone, and it's also extremely lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy M20. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a little bit better pixels quantity in each inch of screen. Galaxy M20 features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4a features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.