Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Just black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a, with an 89 score against 82.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 4a, it's construction is still a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little greater pixel count in each screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a camera with a lower resolution, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.