Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Just black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 global score. Google Pixel 4a's design is extremely newer and somewhat lighter, but just a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little bit higher pixels number per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a camera with more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note7 has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.