Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | TFT |
| 444 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than Galaxy On7 Prime, getting an 82.9 score against 76.9. Google Pixel 4a's design is notably newer and lighter, but just a little thicker than Galaxy On7 Prime. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a little larger display, a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.