Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Just black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Google Pixel 4a, getting a global score of 95.4 against 82.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 4a, but it is just a little thicker and much heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a larger screen, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Google Pixel 4a and the Galaxy S22 Ultra have very similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4a. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.