Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Just black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, with a score of 82.9 against 82.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little worse number of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy S25 has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Google Pixel 4a one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4a features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S25 has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 captures way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.