Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Just black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 overall score. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11, giving you some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and much lighter device than the Google Pixel 4a.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a larger screen.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better video definition.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.