Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Just black | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 444 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Google Pixel 4a design is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both were released only a few months apart.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same size sensor, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a back camera with a higher 12.2 MP resolution and a much higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.