Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Just black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Google Pixel 4a were released only 0 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is thinner but noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 4a.
The Google Pixel 4a and the Galaxy Z Flip 5G both feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, a back-facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse video definition, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.